saco-indonesia.com, Rumah calon legislatif (Caleg) Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa (PKB) nomor urut 2 DPRD Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Sefta Rudianto telah disatroni maling, Minggu dini hari (22/12). Motor Yamaha Mio yang berNomor polisi L-6812-HG miliknya pun juga raib digondol si pencuri.
Diceritakan Sefta, motor warna putih yang telah terparkir di teras rumahnya Jalan Jambangan 77, Surabaya itu, raib menjelang Subuh tadi. Padahal, cakram ban depan motor kesayangannya itu juga sudah dikunci ganda dengan menggunakan gembok.
Selanjutnya, atas kejadian itu, Sefta-pun telah melaporkannya ke Polsek Jambangan. "Habis Salat Subuh, saat saya hendak keluar rumah, ternyata motor sudah tidak ada di tempatnya," terang Sefta usai melapor ke Mapolsek Jambangan.
Sebelum kejadian tersebut , sekitar pukul 00.00 WIB dini hari, dia baru saja pulang dari acara partai pendukungnya. Seperti biasa, sesampai di rumahnya, dia langsung memarkir motornya di halaman rumah dan mengunci Yamaha Mio putih itu dengan gembok ganda.
"Tiap hari memang saya parkir di situ. Biasanya tidak aman-aman saja. Tapi semalam kondisi sekitar rumah memang sepi. Kebetulan juga gerimis dan warga tak ada yang nongkrong di luar rumah seperti biasanya," lanjut dia.
Sefta juga menduga, pelaku juga sudah memantau sekitar rumahnya. Pelaku juga menggunakan kunci duplikat dan gunting besi. Hal itu terlihat dari gembok motor yang ditinggal pelaku. Dan sekitar 04.00 WIB, Sefta yang hendak keluar usai Salat Subuh di rumah, terkejut saat mendapati motornya amblas dan hanya mendapati gemboknya saja.
Sementara itu Kanit Polsek Jambangan, AKP Made Patera Negara juga mengatakan, pasca-laporan Sefta, pihak kepolisian langsung melakukan olah TKP. "Anggota sudah ke sana (TKP). Kita masih selidiki. Kita juga sudah menyebar anggota ke lapangan," tandas Made.
Editor : Dian Sukmawati
RUMAH CALEG PKB DISATRONI MALING
WASHINGTON — During a training course on defending against knife attacks, a young Salt Lake City police officer asked a question: “How close can somebody get to me before I’m justified in using deadly force?”
Dennis Tueller, the instructor in that class more than three decades ago, decided to find out. In the fall of 1982, he performed a rudimentary series of tests and concluded that an armed attacker who bolted toward an officer could clear 21 feet in the time it took most officers to draw, aim and fire their weapon.
The next spring, Mr. Tueller published his findings in SWAT magazine and transformed police training in the United States. The “21-foot rule” became dogma. It has been taught in police academies around the country, accepted by courts and cited by officers to justify countless shootings, including recent episodes involving a homeless woodcarver in Seattle and a schizophrenic woman in San Francisco.
Now, amid the largest national debate over policing since the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, a small but vocal set of law enforcement officials are calling for a rethinking of the 21-foot rule and other axioms that have emphasized how to use force, not how to avoid it. Several big-city police departments are already re-examining when officers should chase people or draw their guns and when they should back away, wait or try to defuse the situation
Police Rethink Long Tradition on Using Force