berangkat haji menuju tanah suci 08111-34-1212 mengisi panggilan-Mu, dgn cepat tentunya yakni adalah hal yg diharapkan utk orang yang pernah tak bisa memikul keinginan cintanya terhadap Baitullah. Ya, hal inimemang sangat alami sekali. Mestinya bertambah cepat kian baik dilakukan, daripada menantikan kian lama, sedemikian uang yang dimiliki pernah memenuhi utk pergi secara mandiri ataupun backpacker, atau dgn menumpang agen perjalanan umroh & haji yang sudah tersedia luas & mengantongi reputasi di kalangan masyarakat. Bila bisa dan kawakan, boleh-boleh jua berangkat haji secara mandiri. Tetapi, gimana dengan yang belum memiliki cakap? Andaikata telah cukup malah alangkah baiknya menggunakan biro jasa perjalanan umrah bersama haji. karena, dengan seperti itu, perjalanan haji kemudian bakal terasa khusyuk & paling aman sekali dialami. Nah, biro perjalanan umrah beserta haji yang sudah benar bila dipilih adalah pt. alhijaz indowisata tour & travel. benar tidak bisa dipungkiri terus bahwa alhijaz indowisata mempunyai pengalaman yg terbilang telah memadai panjang termasuk per th 2000, terus mengantongi jam terbang yg baik, mempunyai ijin legal umroh & haji dan provider visa, badan usaha yang legal, & yg Pastinya baik.
Ibadah haji, pada dasarnya nyatanya ditentukan oleh perseorangan setiap sejak yang beribadah. Cuma jua, sekali waktu keringanan bersama kehebatan beragam. Rata-rata terurai di dalam 2 golongan, haji regular dan haji khusus. Fasilitas haji plus mesti jua menakjubkan. Seperti penginapan bintang 5 dan yg paling nomor satu adalah tempatnya yang sekitar dgn Masjidil Haram, menjadi sentral dari ibadah haji. Nikmatnya haji khusus, dapat beribadah kapan saja, 24 jam full, karena posisinya tidak jauh. Mau menuju Masjidil Haram seharian, tergantung tujuan individu masing-masing, menginginkan beribadah ataupun ingin tawaf di mall. jamaah tiap senja solat di dalam depan Ka Bah, sore Dhuhah juga, sendiri-sendiri pagi aja bisa. Bagi itu, sudah menentukan yg terang pula pertama dengan bacaan Bismilah sesudah itu tepat segera meregistrasi ibadah haji menuju pt alhijaz indowisata dengan program paket haji plus 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 yang diadakan alhijaz indowisata umroh sejak kini. Kumpulan cepat, dgn keinginan yang yakin insyaaAllah ibadah kita Akan fasih & sebagai haji yg mabrur. Program paket haji ini, bergaransi dan mengantongi pelayanan cakap dan kemudahan dan Kemudahan yang menjamin keperluan Anda. Kunjungi website resmi kami www.alhijazindowisata.net
WASHINGTON, Saco-
Indonesia.com - Ilmuwan berhasil menemukan satu lagi planet alien alias planet yang
berada di luar Tata Surya. Planet tersebut dinamai Kepler 76b serta punya sebutan Planet
Einstein.
Planet Einstein adalah planet gas panas yang ukurannya 25 persen
lebih besar dari Jupiter. Planet ini berjarak 2000 tahun cahaya dari Bumi.
Planet ini berjarak sangat dekat dengan bintangnya. Lingkungannya amat panas, suhunya
mencapai 1982 derajat Celsius. Sementara, satu tahun di planet ini setara dengan 1,5 hari di
Bumi.
Ilmuwan menyebut Kepler 76-b sebagai planet Einstein karena terkait
proses penemuannya yang didasarkan pada pemahaman tentang relativitas Einstein.
Teknik penemuan planet terbaru itu pertama kali dikemukakan oleh Avie Loeb dari Harvard
Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) pada tahun 2003.
Dengan teknik ini,
penemuan planet dilakukan dengan melihat perubahan kecil pada bintang akibat planet yang
mengelilinginya dan perubahan jaraknya relatif terhadap Bumi.
Perubahan yang
dilihat antara lain peningkatan intensitas cahaya bintang akibat jaraknya yang lebih dekat
terhadap Bumi dan peredupannya saat menjauh.
Perubahan lain yang dilihat
adalah pelebaran kenampakan bintang hingga menyerupai football akibat gaya tarik planet yang
mengelilinginya. Pelebaran juga menyebabkan peningkatan intensitas cahaya.
Sementara, hal terakhir yang dilihat adalah cahaya bintang yang dipantulkan oleh planet yang
mengelilinginya.
"Kami mendeteksi efek yang sangat kecil. Kami butuh
pengukuran dengan akurasi tinggi untuk melihat kecerlangan bintang, hingga skala bagian per
juta," kata David Latham dari CfA.
Simchon Faigler dari Tel Aviv
University di Israel yang juga terlibat studi menuturkan bahwa hal pengukuran dimungkinkan
karena data memadai yang telah dikoleksi wahana Kepler.
Tsevi Mazeh dari Tel
Aviv Unicersity seperti dikutip Physorg, Senin (13/5/2013), mengatakan, "Ini
pertama kalinya aspek teori relativitas Einstein dipakai untuk menemukan planet."
Penemuan planet biasanya dilakukan dengan metode transit, dengan melihat peredupan
cahaya bintang saat ada planet melewati mukanya, atau teknik radial velocity.
Walau tak mampu menemukan planet sukuran Bumi, teknik baru ini memberikan kelebihan. Misalnya,
penemuan planet alien tak harus menunggu adanya planet yang transit di muka bintangnya.
Penemuan Planet Einstein dipublikasikan di Astrophysical Journal, pasa Senin
kemarin.
Ex-C.I.A. Official Rebuts Republican Claims on Benghazi Attack in ‘The Great War of Our Time’
WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.
The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.
“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.
A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.
In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.
Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.
Advertisement
“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”
He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.
“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.
Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.
Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.
Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.
But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.
The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.
But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.
Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.
“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.
Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.
Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”
Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.
Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.
“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”