MAU UMROH BERSAMA TRAVEL TERBAIK DI INDONESIA ALHIJAZ INDO WISTA..?

YOOK LANGSUNG WHATSAPP AJA KLIK DISINI 811-1341-212
 

umroh februari

pergi haji  menuju tanah suci 08111-34-1212 mengisi panggilan-Mu, dengan segera tentunya merupakan ialah hal yang diimpikan utk orang yang pernah tidak bisa menahan keinginan cintanya kepada Baitullah. Ya,  acara ini sungguh sangat wajar sekali.  Nyatanya kian cepat  makin baik  direalisasikan,  ketimbang menunggu makin lama, sedangkan finansial yg dipunyai pernah memadai untuk pergi secara berdikari maupun backpacker,  ataupun dengan menumpang biro perjalanan umroh dengan haji  yg telah terpercaya dengan mempunyai label di kalangan  umum.  Jika bisa bersama profesional,  bisa-bisa aja pergi haji secara  mandiri.  Akan tetapi, bagaimana dgn yang tak memiliki pandai?  Sekiranya pernah cukup malah  alangkah baiknya menumpang biro jasa perjalanan  umrah dengan haji.  lantaran,  dgn serupa itu, perjalanan haji  besok hendak terasa  khusyuk bersama paling menenangkan sekali  dinikmati. Nah, biro perjalanan umroh dengan haji yang pernah jitu bila dipilih merupakan pt. alhijaz indowisata jakarta. memang tdk bisa diragukan pula bahwa travel umroh alhijaz indowisata daerah khusus ibukota jakarta mengantongi terampil yang terbilang sudah cukup panjang terbilang per thn 2000,  sesudah itu mengantongi waktu terbang yang bagus,  mempunyai izin legal umroh bersama haji dan provider visa, kantor yang resmi,  bersama yang Jelasnya baik.

Ibadah haji,  oleh dasarnya  nyatanya  diatur  pada pribadi setiap  sejak yang beribadah.  Hanya  juga,  sesekali  keringanan  dengan  kehebatan  berbagai.  Kebanyakan  terpecah dalam  2  bagian, haji  regular  bersama haji  onh plus.  Fasilitas haji khusus  benar  jua  istimewa. Seperti  penginapan bintang  lima  & yang  sangat  menarik  adalah  kedudukannya yang dekat dengan Masjidil Haram,  menjadi  sentral  mulai ibadah haji.  Beruntungnya haji  onh plus,  bisa beribadah  seharian, 24 jam  penuh, sebab  kedudukannya  sekitar.  Akan ke Masjidil Haram kapan saja,  terserah  tujuan  diri masing-masing, inginkan beribadah atau menginginkan tawaf  di mall.  jemaah setiap  sore  shalat  di dalam depan Ka Bah,  petang  Duha  pula, masing-masing pagi  pula  bisa. Bagi itu,  pernah pilih yang  mesti  jua dimulai  dgn bacaan Basmallah  terus  jitu cepat  mendaftar ibadah haji ke alhijaz indowisata  dgn program paket haji khusus 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027  yg diadakan pt alhijaz indowisata  per sekarang. Kumpulan cepat,  dgn  maksud  yg  percaya  insyaaAllah ibadah kita  Akan fasih  dengan sebagai haji yang mabrur. Program paket haji ini,  di jamin  bersama  mengantongi layanan  cakap  &  keringanan  bersama  Fasilitas  yg  mengurus kebutuhan Anda. Kunjungi website resmi kami www.alhijazindowisata.net

harga paket haji onh plus 2024

saco-indoneswia.com, Performa buruk Manchester United musim ini ternyata tidak dapat membuat Tim Howard sedikit pun juga meragukan kemampuan tim yang juga pernah ia bela tersebut.

Howard juga sempat menghabiskan karirnya selama empat tahun di Old Trafford sebelum ia akhirnya telah memutuskan untuk pindah ke Everton. Kiper asal Amerika Serikat itu telah menyebut setan merah musim ini masih belum dapat membuktikan apapun. Tim asuhan David Moyes itu ia sebut masih telah memiliki banyak potensi yang belum dapat terungkap.

"Saya juga merasa bahwa apa yang kita pikirkan sekarang (tentang United) tidak akan terjadi pada bulan Mei nanti (akhir kompetisi Premier League) karena mereka sudah jelas merupakan juara bertahan dan mereka masih harus banyak memberikan bukti pada berbagai pihak," tutur Howard pada Sky Sports.

"Saya juga masih mengharap mereka untuk dapat terus menekan tim menuju arah yang benar, jadi kita lihat saja apa yang terjadi. Saya juga harap kami bisa terus menjauh dari mereka di klasemen, namun mereka jelas jauh lebih baik dari ini," pungkas sang kiper.

Manchester United saat ini telah terdampar di peringkat tujuh klasemen sementara Premier League.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

EGGAN HAKIMI UNITED

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

Ex-C.I.A. Official Rebuts Republican Claims on Benghazi Attack in The Great War of Our Time

Artikel lainnya »