Paket Umroh 12 hari pesawat langsung Madinah

Pulau Sulawesi terkenal dengan keindahan laut merupakan salah satu Taman Nasional Bunaken terletak di Sulawesi Utara dan berjarak ± 8 km dari daratan Kota Manado. Lokasinya cukup strategis untuk membuatnya mudah untuk taman dikunjungi oleh wisatawan baik dari domestik maupun dari luar negeri.Taman Nasional Bunaken merupakan satu-satu tujuan rekreasi bagi wisatawan diminati wisatawan domestik dan asing yang cukup.

Kegiatan yang dapat dilakukan di Taman Nasional Laut Bunaken adalah seperti berjemur di pantai, berenang di laut, menyelam (diving), snorkeling, menjelajahi hutan di sekitar Taman Laut pantai.Secara keseluruhan Taman Nasional memiliki luas wilayah 75.265 hektar di yang terdapat lima pulau, yaitu Pulau Bunaken, Pulau Manado Tua, Pulau Siladen, Pulau Mantehage bersama dengan beberapa pulau dan anak terakhir Pulau Naen. Meskipun hal ini Taman laut ini memiliki lima pulau yang berdekatan, hanya yang paling terkenal Bunaken Island sebagai tempat menyelam.

Kawasan Park pada tahun 1991 sebagai taman laut nasional yang diresmikan oleh Menteri Kelautan dan berfungsi sebagai objek wisata bahari dan pendidikan serta melihat potensi kegiatan ekologi alam dan konservasi laut daerah ini. Selain kegiatan wisata, taman laut yang sangat baik untuk pengembangan pengetahuan pendidikan orang dewasa dan anak-anak tentang sumber daya alam dan laut.

Taman Nasional Laut Bunaken adalah salah satu taman laut paling indah di dunia, terkenal dengan formasi karang yang sangat indah dan luas. taman laut juga merupakan habitat lebih dari 3000 jenis ikan yang perlu dijaga dari kepunahan, seperti lolosi ikan ekor kuning (Lutjanus kasmira), kuda ikan gusumi (hippocampus kuda), goropa (spilotoceps ephinephelus), OCI putih (seriola rivoliana ) dan banyak orang lain juga telah memiliki keragaman spesies langka organisme air seperti lumba-lumba, sapi laut, dugong-dugong dan juga telah memiliki berbagai jenis ikan hias yang sangat indah.

Taman Nasional Bunaken telah memiliki wilayah yang cukup besar untuk dapat melakukan penyelaman, meskipun masih terbatas hanya lokasi penyelaman di sekitar pantai yang telah mengelilingi kelima pulau, hal ini juga dilakukan untuk keselamatan pengunjung dan untuk memfasilitasi petugas dalam mengawasi para pengunjung pantai.

Pengunjung juga dapat menyelam dan menyaksikan ikan tropis dan terumbu karang yang menakjubkan dan indah sehingga pengunjung dijamin akan kagum melihat dan tidak dapat melupakannya.

Untuk diving, Taman Laut Taman Nasional juga merupakan salah menyelam 10 tempat di dunia yang paling populer.

Ada 20 poin dimana menyelam (dive spot) dengan kedalaman bervariasi hingga 1.344 meter di wilayah taman laut ini. Dari 20 poin menyelam, 12 poin di antaranya di sekitar Pulau Bunaken dan paling sering dikunjungi oleh penyelam dan wisatawan.

Marine fenomena alam yang ada di TN Bunaken adalah unik dan hampir pasti tidak akan ditemukan di taman laut lainnya. Taman laut ini juga telah memiliki keunikkan sebuah dinding karang raksasa yang berdiri vertikal dan melengkung ke atas atau disebut tembok besar air atau dinding gantung. dinding Rock adalah juga sumber mana makanan bagi ikan di perairan sekitar Pulau Bunaken.

Akses ke Taman Laut Nasional Bunaken

Untuk dapat mengunjungi taman ini, pengunjung juga dapat menggunakan perahu motor sewaan berangkat dari pantai di kota teluk Manado terhadap taman laut.

Fasilitas Tersedia

Sekitar lokasi hotel yang tersedia, resort, homestay, kolam renang, restoran, kantor pos, menara, gerbang, speed boat.

Ada juga peralatan menyelam sewa bersama dengan instruktur.

Ketika Terbaik Untuk Kunjungi Taman Nasional Bunaken

Musim terbaik untuk dapat mengunjungi Taman Laut Taman Nasional Mei.-Agust.

Yang Dibawa Persediaan Wajib

Dalam kondisi tertentu diperlukan untuk dapat melindungi diri dari angin laut, perlu untuk membawa baju hangat atau jaket, tutup kepala, syal untuk penghangat leher.

Harus Perhatian

Ada baiknya ketika mereka mengunjungi Taman Laut Taman Nasional dalam kondisi kesehatan keadaan prima.


UNITED NATIONS — Wearing pinstripes and a pince-nez, Staffan de Mistura, the United Nations envoy for Syria, arrived at the Security Council one Tuesday afternoon in February and announced that President Bashar al-Assad had agreed to halt airstrikes over Aleppo. Would the rebels, Mr. de Mistura suggested, agree to halt their shelling?

What he did not announce, but everyone knew by then, was that the Assad government had begun a military offensive to encircle opposition-held enclaves in Aleppo and that fierce fighting was underway. It would take only a few days for rebel leaders, having pushed back Syrian government forces, to outright reject Mr. de Mistura’s proposed freeze in the fighting, dooming the latest diplomatic overture on Syria.

Diplomacy is often about appearing to be doing something until the time is ripe for a deal to be done.



Now, with Mr. Assad’s forces having suffered a string of losses on the battlefield and the United States reaching at least a partial rapprochement with Mr. Assad’s main backer, Iran, Mr. de Mistura is changing course. Starting Monday, he is set to hold a series of closed talks in Geneva with the warring sides and their main supporters. Iran will be among them.

In an interview at United Nations headquarters last week, Mr. de Mistura hinted that the changing circumstances, both military and diplomatic, may have prompted various backers of the war to question how much longer the bloodshed could go on.

“Will that have an impact in accelerating the willingness for a political solution? We need to test it,” he said. “The Geneva consultations may be a good umbrella for testing that. It’s an occasion for asking everyone, including the government, if there is any new way that they are looking at a political solution, as they too claim they want.”

He said he would have a better assessment at the end of June, when he expects to wrap up his consultations. That coincides with the deadline for a final agreement in the Iran nuclear talks.


Whether a nuclear deal with Iran will pave the way for a new opening on peace talks in Syria remains to be seen. Increasingly, though, world leaders are explicitly linking the two, with the European Union’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, suggesting last week that a nuclear agreement could spur Tehran to play “a major but positive role in Syria.”

It could hardly come soon enough. Now in its fifth year, the Syrian war has claimed 220,000 lives, prompted an exodus of more than three million refugees and unleashed jihadist groups across the region. “This conflict is producing a question mark in many — where is it leading and whether this can be sustained,” Mr. de Mistura said.

Part Italian, part Swedish, Mr. de Mistura has worked with the United Nations for more than 40 years, but he is more widely known for his dapper style than for any diplomatic coups. Syria is by far the toughest assignment of his career — indeed, two of the organization’s most seasoned diplomats, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan, tried to do the job and gave up — and critics have wondered aloud whether Mr. de Mistura is up to the task.

He served as a United Nations envoy in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Lebanon, where a former minister recalled, with some scorn, that he spent many hours sunbathing at a private club in the hills above Beirut. Those who know him say he has a taste for fine suits and can sometimes speak too soon and too much, just as they point to his diplomatic missteps and hyperbole.

They cite, for instance, a news conference in October, when he raised the specter of Srebrenica, where thousands of Muslims were massacred in 1995 during the Balkans war, in warning that the Syrian border town of Kobani could fall to the Islamic State. In February, he was photographed at a party in Damascus, the Syrian capital, celebrating the anniversary of the Iranian revolution just as Syrian forces, aided by Iran, were pummeling rebel-held suburbs of Damascus; critics seized on that as evidence of his coziness with the government.

Mouin Rabbani, who served briefly as the head of Mr. de Mistura’s political affairs unit and has since emerged as one of his most outspoken critics, said Mr. de Mistura did not have the background necessary for the job. “This isn’t someone well known for his political vision or political imagination, and his closest confidants lack the requisite knowledge and experience,” Mr. Rabbani said.

As a deputy foreign minister in the Italian government, Mr. de Mistura was tasked in 2012 with freeing two Italian marines detained in India for shooting at Indian fishermen. He made 19 trips to India, to little effect. One marine was allowed to return to Italy for medical reasons; the other remains in India.

He said he initially turned down the Syria job when the United Nations secretary general approached him last August, only to change his mind the next day, after a sleepless, guilt-ridden night.

Mr. de Mistura compared his role in Syria to that of a doctor faced with a terminally ill patient. His goal in brokering a freeze in the fighting, he said, was to alleviate suffering. He settled on Aleppo as the location for its “fame,” he said, a decision that some questioned, considering that Aleppo was far trickier than the many other lesser-known towns where activists had negotiated temporary local cease-fires.

“Everybody, at least in Europe, are very familiar with the value of Aleppo,” Mr. de Mistura said. “So I was using that as an icebreaker.”

The cease-fire negotiations, to which he had devoted six months, fell apart quickly because of the government’s military offensive in Aleppo the very day of his announcement at the Security Council. Privately, United Nations diplomats said Mr. de Mistura had been manipulated. To this, Mr. de Mistura said only that he was “disappointed and concerned.”

Tarek Fares, a former rebel fighter, said after a recent visit to Aleppo that no Syrian would admit publicly to supporting Mr. de Mistura’s cease-fire proposal. “If anyone said they went to a de Mistura meeting in Gaziantep, they would be arrested,” is how he put it, referring to the Turkish city where negotiations between the two sides were held.

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon remains staunchly behind Mr. de Mistura’s efforts. His defenders point out that he is at the center of one of the world’s toughest diplomatic problems, charged with mediating a conflict in which two of the world’s most powerful nations — Russia, which supports Mr. Assad, and the United States, which has called for his ouster — remain deadlocked.

R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who now teaches at Harvard, credited Mr. de Mistura for trying to negotiate a cease-fire even when the chances of success were exceedingly small — and the chances of a political deal even smaller. For his efforts to work, Professor Burns argued, the world powers will first have to come to an agreement of their own.

“He needs the help of outside powers,” he said. “It starts with backers of Assad. That’s Russia and Iran. De Mistura is there, waiting.”

With Iran Talks, a Tangled Path to Ending Syriaís War

Artikel lainnya »