Umroh November

Siapa sih yang tidak mau tidur dengan nyenyak? Tentu saja “terms & conditions” orang biar bisa tidur nyenyak sangat berbeda-beda. Beberapa orang telah memerlukan kehadiran lampu tidur biar bisa nyenyak. Kalau kamu termasuk tipe yang satu ini, maka banyak lho pilihan lampu tidur murah yang lucu-lucu.

Lampu tidur murah yang berkarakter telah banyak ditemukan, tapi sulit untuk menentukan mana yang berkualitas. Pasalnya, lampu tidur adalah alat elektronik, dan keamanan telah menjadi salah satu prioritas utama juga. Jadi, jangan cuma memilih lampu tidur dengan karakter kesukaan saja, tapi juga faktor lain yang membuatnya fungsional.

Ukuran Lampu Tidur Murah

Karena fungsinya hanya sebagai penerangan secukupnya saja, maka ukuran dari lampu tidur murah yang kamu pilih pun harusnya tidak terlalu besar. Malah, lebih baik lagi jika lampu tidur ini dipilih dengan ukuran yang kecil saja, agar tidak terlalu memakan tempat juga.

Kalau kamu susah menemukannya, lampu meja juga dapat dijadikan alternative sebagai pilihan lampu tidur murah. Sekarang ini banyak juga lampu meja dengan konsep karakter lucu yang dijual.

Lampu Tidur Murah yang Tidak Silau

Intensitas cahaya juga telah menjadi salah satu faktor penentu lampu tidur murah yang akan dibeli. Karena sifatnya hanya untuk menemani tidur kamu, pilihlah lampu tidur murah dengan intensitas yang rendah saja. Kalau terlalu silau, kamu malah tidak bisa tidur nantinya.

Warna Lampu Tidur Murah

Warna dari lampu tidur murah juga harus diperhatikan. Pilihlah warna lampu kuning tidak cocok untuk lampu tidur, karena warna kuning akan dapat merangsang orang untuk tetap beraktivitas. Kalau kamu perhatikan di kamar hotel, warna lampu tidurnya adalah putih kebiruan yang cukup muram. Warna ini akan dapat membuat kamu mengantuk lebih cepat.

Tata Letak Lampu Tidur Murah

Jika kamu sudah membeli lampu tidur murah dengan karakter yang kamu sukai, kini kamu juga harus mengetahui teknik peletakan lampu tidur ini. Kalau kamu pakai lampu meja sebagai lampu tidurmu, kamu tidak perlu memindahkannya lagi. Tetap letakkan di atas meja saja, dan nyalakan pada saat kamu ingin tidur.

Satu hal penting yang harus kamu ingat kalau kamu mau meletakkan lampu tidur murah yang baru kamu beli adalah jarak dengan ranjang. Kamu tentu tidak mau muka dipapar sinar ketika tidur, dong? Walaupun sinarnya remang, tetap saja itu malah menjadi polusi cahaya buatmu. Jadi, letakkan setidaknya agak jauh agar tidak mencapai muka.



WASHINGTON — The last three men to win the Republican nomination have been the prosperous son of a president (George W. Bush), a senator who could not recall how many homes his family owned (John McCain of Arizona; it was seven) and a private equity executive worth an estimated $200 million (Mitt Romney).

The candidates hoping to be the party’s nominee in 2016 are trying to create a very different set of associations. On Sunday, Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, joined the presidential field.

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida praises his parents, a bartender and a Kmart stock clerk, as he urges audiences not to forget “the workers in our hotel kitchens, the landscaping crews in our neighborhoods, the late-night janitorial staff that clean our offices.”

Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, a preacher’s son, posts on Twitter about his ham-and-cheese sandwiches and boasts of his coupon-clipping frugality. His $1 Kohl’s sweater has become a campaign celebrity in its own right.

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky laments the existence of “two Americas,” borrowing the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s phrase to describe economically and racially troubled communities like Ferguson, Mo., and Detroit.

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida praises his parents, a bartender and a Kmart stock clerk. Credit Joe Raedle/Getty Images

“Some say, ‘But Democrats care more about the poor,’ ” Mr. Paul likes to say. “If that’s true, why is black unemployment still twice white unemployment? Why has household income declined by $3,500 over the past six years?”

We are in the midst of the Empathy Primary — the rhetorical battleground shaping the Republican presidential field of 2016.

Harmed by the perception that they favor the wealthy at the expense of middle-of-the-road Americans, the party’s contenders are each trying their hardest to get across what the elder George Bush once inelegantly told recession-battered voters in 1992: “Message: I care.”

Their ability to do so — less bluntly, more sincerely — could prove decisive in an election year when power, privilege and family connections will loom large for both parties.


Questions of understanding and compassion cost Republicans in the last election. Mr. Romney, who memorably dismissed the “47 percent” of Americans as freeloaders, lost to President Obama by 63 percentage points among voters who cast their ballots for the candidate who “cares about people like me,” according to exit polls.

And a Pew poll from February showed that people still believe Republicans are indifferent to working Americans: 54 percent said the Republican Party does not care about the middle class.

That taint of callousness explains why Senator Ted Cruz of Texas declared last week that Republicans “are and should be the party of the 47 percent” — and why another son of a president, Jeb Bush, has made economic opportunity the centerpiece of his message.

With his pedigree and considerable wealth — since he left the Florida governor’s office almost a decade ago he has earned millions of dollars sitting on corporate boards and advising banks — Mr. Bush probably has the most complicated task making the argument to voters that he understands their concerns.

On a visit last week to Puerto Rico, Mr. Bush sounded every bit the populist, railing against “elites” who have stifled economic growth and innovation. In the kind of economy he envisions leading, he said: “We wouldn’t have the middle being squeezed. People in poverty would have a chance to rise up. And the social strains that exist — because the haves and have-nots is the big debate in our country today — would subside.”

Continue reading the main story

Who Is Running for President (and Who’s Not)?

Republicans’ emphasis on poorer and working-class Americans now represents a shift from the party’s longstanding focus on business owners and “job creators” as the drivers of economic opportunity.

This is intentional, Republican operatives said.

In the last presidential election, Republicans rushed to defend business owners against what they saw as hostility by Democrats to successful, wealthy entrepreneurs.

“Part of what you had was a reaction to the Democrats’ dehumanization of business owners: ‘Oh, you think you started your plumbing company? No you didn’t,’ ” said Grover Norquist, the conservative activist and president of Americans for Tax Reform.

But now, Mr. Norquist said, Republicans should move past that. “Focus on the people in the room who know someone who couldn’t get a job, or a promotion, or a raise because taxes are too high or regulations eat up companies’ time,” he said. “The rich guy can take care of himself.”

Democrats argue that the public will ultimately see through such an approach because Republican positions like opposing a minimum-wage increase and giving private banks a larger role in student loans would hurt working Americans.

“If Republican candidates are just repeating the same tired policies, I’m not sure that smiling while saying it is going to be enough,” said Guy Cecil, a Democratic strategist who is joining a “super PAC” working on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Republicans have already attacked Mrs. Clinton over the wealth and power she and her husband have accumulated, caricaturing her as an out-of-touch multimillionaire who earns hundreds of thousands of dollars per speech and has not driven a car since 1996.

Mr. Walker hit this theme recently on Fox News, pointing to Mrs. Clinton’s lucrative book deals and her multiple residences. “This is not someone who is connected with everyday Americans,” he said. His own net worth, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, is less than a half-million dollars; Mr. Walker also owes tens of thousands of dollars on his credit cards.

Continue reading the main story

But showing off a cheap sweater or boasting of a bootstraps family background not only helps draw a contrast with Mrs. Clinton’s latter-day affluence, it is also an implicit argument against Mr. Bush.

Mr. Walker, who featured a 1998 Saturn with more than 100,000 miles on the odometer in a 2010 campaign ad during his first run for governor, likes to talk about flipping burgers at McDonald’s as a young person. His mother, he has said, grew up on a farm with no indoor plumbing until she was in high school.

Mr. Rubio, among the least wealthy members of the Senate, with an estimated net worth of around a half-million dollars, uses his working-class upbringing as evidence of the “exceptionalism” of America, “where even the son of a bartender and a maid can have the same dreams and the same future as those who come from power and privilege.”

Mr. Cruz alludes to his family’s dysfunction — his parents, he says, were heavy drinkers — and recounts his father’s tale of fleeing Cuba with $100 sewn into his underwear.

Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey notes that his father paid his way through college working nights at an ice cream plant.

But sometimes the attempts at projecting authenticity can seem forced. Mr. Christie recently found himself on the defensive after telling a New Hampshire audience, “I don’t consider myself a wealthy man.” Tax returns showed that he and his wife, a longtime Wall Street executive, earned nearly $700,000 in 2013.

The story of success against the odds is a political classic, even if it is one the Republican Party has not been able to tell for a long time. Ronald Reagan liked to say that while he had not been born on the wrong side of the tracks, he could always hear the whistle. Richard Nixon was fond of reminding voters how he was born in a house his father had built.

“Probably the idea that is most attractive to an average voter, and an idea that both Republicans and Democrats try to craft into their messages, is this idea that you can rise from nothing,” said Charles C. W. Cooke, a writer for National Review.

There is a certain delight Republicans take in turning that message to their advantage now.

“That’s what Obama did with Hillary,” Mr. Cooke said. “He acknowledged it openly: ‘This is ridiculous. Look at me, this one-term senator with dark skin and all of America’s unsolved racial problems, running against the wife of the last Democratic president.”

G.O.P. Hopefuls Now Aiming to Woo the Middle Class

Artikel lainnya »